Spring 2008

Nehemiah’s Wall Discovered

By Adam Pivec

You might not think that something as colossal and as well known as Nehemiah’s wall would be hard to find. But this 15-foot thick stone wall eluded archaeologists for centuries — causing some scholars to suggest that it never existed.

But, on Nov. 8, 2007, at a conference held at Bar Ilan University in Israel, Hebrew University archaeologist Eilat Mazar announced the discovery of a 30-meter section of the wall made famous by the biblical account of Nehemiah.

The wall was unearthed in February 2007 in the ancient City of David, just south of the old city of Jerusalem, during a dig jointly sponsored by the Shalem Center, a Jerusalem research institute, and the City of David Foundation, a nonprofit organization for the preservation of the biblical City of David. It was found during an excavation of what Mazar believes to be King David’s palace.

What led to the recent identification of the wall was the structural decay of a stone tower on the northern end of the excavation site. The tower — previously believed to have been builtin 142-137 B.C. during the Hasmonean Dynasty — was on the brink of collapse. Members of Mazar’s team made emergency attempts to prop it up. In doing so, they began an unplanned dig that led to a treasure trove of artifacts hidden underneath the tower.

The artifacts — including arrowheads, pottery, seals and even the bones of two large dogs — were dated no later than the Persian period (sixth to fifth centuries B.C.). This led to the revised dating of the tower and wall to the Persian period — the time that is specified in the Bible for the construction of Nehemiah’s wall.

Not all scholars agree with the implications of Mazar’s findings. Israel Finkelstein, a professor of archaeology at Tel Aviv University, argues that since the artifacts were not connected to a floor or other structural part of the wall, then the wall could have been built later.

Yet, Richard Rigsby, professor of Old Testament and Semitics at Biola’s Talbot School of Theology, rallied to Mazar’s cause saying, “Finkelstein is overstating his case. The language he’s using is more the language of debate than that of scholarship.”

Rigsby attributed Finkelstein’s skepticism to a “friendly competition” between the archaeologists at Tel Aviv’s University and those at Hebrew University. “They’re both trying to win the Super Bowl of Israeli archaeology,” he said.

So, Finkelstein doesn’t want to concede Mazar’s discovery, according to Rigsby.

But after seeing the wall first hand, Rigsby is convinced it’s Nehemiah’s Wall. He, along with 47 Talbot students and their family members, visited the site in January, during their stay in Jerusalem on the Talbot/Bible Lands Program tour. Though Mazar was not present, the other archaeologists invited the group to see the excavation. After viewing the location where the artifacts were found, Rigsby said that they certainly go with the wall even though they are not attached to the floor.

“The floor where the artifacts were found intersects the wall. It appears to be genuinely Nehemiah,” he said.

According to the biblical account, Nehemiah — a Jewish cupbearer to the Persian king, Artaxerxes — wanted to rebuild the broken wall surrounding Jerusalem after hearing of the plight of the Jews who had gone back there after their Babylonian exile. Nehemiah successfully petitioned the king to allow him to take a leave of absence from his court duties to help them. Despite opposition from the surrounding peoples, he consolidated the disheartened Jewish people into a unified and inspired working force. By God’s hand they did the unthinkable — they repaired the wall swiftly, in a mere 52 days.

Thomas Finley, chair of the Old Testament and Semitics department at Talbot, said that for Christians who already believe in the reliability of the Bible the discovery is “not earth shattering, but it shows that we have even more of a historical document in the Bible.” Yet, he admits that he’s personally delighted by the find.

“That we have a piece of the wall is kind of exciting,” Finley said.



  • Nancy Russell September 19, 2013 at 4:38 AM


  • Peter Blockhan February 11, 2014 at 6:17 AM

    Somewhere in my memory I believe I was told or read that Nehemiah's wall was filled with rubble thus promting the remark that "a fox could break it down". But in actuality (again in my dim memory) this turned out to be a stronger form of construction than a solid block wall; being more resistant to batering. Please correct me if I am wrong.
    Pete B.

  • nanci wood January 23, 2017 at 12:46 PM

    BUILT wall or walls. 1 Kings 6:15 2 Chronicles 27:3;32:5;33:14 Nehemiah 4:6;7:1 Ezekiel 13:10 Daniel 9:25 Micah 7:11

  • kamogelo February 16, 2017 at 11:58 PM

    i concern on the issue that Nehimia was, There were things he want to protected , those things that he admired , those thing that he love .
    never the less what things he love .
    my thinking also is we as bible readers we should know thing we are proud of that God gave us
    things like sing to God always if we have voices to sing
    praise God with every thing that we can
    pray always

  • Is Avery January 16, 2018 at 2:07 PM

    Finley is correct this is proof that god is real just explain who made us? He is

Post a comment

Comments are now closed.

Issue Highlights

  • Worlds Apart

    Most Christians live outside the U.S. They share our beliefs, but the similarities end there.

Back to Spring 2008 Home

Biola University
13800 Biola Ave. La Mirada, CA 90639
© Biola University, Inc. All Rights Reserved.